SUPPORT HB 1646: Combatting sexually abusive materials of children

Summary

House Bill 1646 gives the Attorney General the ability to impose civil penalties of $1 million on large corporations which knowingly make available sexually abusive materials of children. To be subject to this penalty a corporation must have a stock market capitalization of at least $100 billion. The legislation clarifies that if multiple corporations are involved in making available the abusive content in a single instance, each may be subject to the fine. The bill also establishes the child sexually abusive material facilitation prevention fund. Money collected from the penalties will be deposited in this fund to assist in the investigation of corporations which have potentially made available sexually abusive content of children. 

Analysis

We live in an age where pornography is more accessible than ever, with countless porn websites and mainstream social media platforms containing porn spread across the internet. This new age of pornography has brought with it a multitude of consequences, one of the most depraved being the spread of child sexual abuse materials. In 2014, the number of reports of child sexual abuse imagery surpassed one million for the first time, but by 2018 the number of reports had risen all the way to 18 million, representing 45 million images and videos of child porn. This number has likely skyrocketed all the more since the COVID-19 pandemic, and the content that gets reported is sure to be far less than the true total.

Major social media corporations have been less than willing to truly confront child pornography on their sites. And even if they were, this would do nothing to solve the problem posed by the major porn sites, easily accessible on any device, being rife with child porn even if it is technically against their policies. Furthermore, countless sites on the dark web specifically promote, share, and encourage the production of child sexual abuse content. Indiana must not ignore this issue any longer as do so many companies and people in power. HB 1646 is critical to get justice for victims of online child abuse who reside in Indiana by directly targeting and penalizing the companies and websites that make this terrible crime possible.

Conclusion

Online child sexual abuse goes after the most vulnerable in our society to form an evil industry worth billions of dollars. Facilitating this crime needs to be treated severely by the law, and that is just what HB 1646 would do. Large social media giants have failed to keep deviancy off of their platforms. Porn websites, on and off the dark web, gladly allow or even promote child porn as they are devoid of all values and just want more traffic to their sites. Children in Indiana must be kept safe from online sexual abuse and those who are victims at the very least deserve the people responsible for their abuse to be held accountable. Indiana must take a stand to protect the innocence of children and fight back against the ever-increasing tide of sexual perversion haunting the internet.

IFI supports HB 1646.

  Back

SUPPORT SB 350: Protecting religious liberty in counseling

Summary

Senate Bill 350 would prevent political subdivisions in Indiana from regulating various types of counseling services, leaving this responsibility to the state government. Political subdivisions include the governments of cities, towns, counties, and any other local government entities. The legislation applies to services that perform marriage and family therapy, social work, mental health counseling, and addiction counseling. Both licensed and unlicensed practices are shielded under this bill from regulation by political subdivisions.

Analysis

It is vital that Indiana protects the rights of counseling services to operate as they wish and the ability of Hoosiers to access them. In 2022, the city of West Lafayette attempted to infringe on religious liberty by banning unlicensed individuals from providing children with counseling on sexuality from a Christian perspective. This would have made the services offered by many churches illegal, as they often work with counselors who qualify under the tenants of their faith, not under the rules of state or medical licensing boards. Furthermore, many activists wanted the West Lafayette ban to go even further and ban counseling on sexuality from licensed providers as well. West Lafayette reversed this unconstitutional mandate when met with immediate pushback, but state law must ensure that another situation like this does not arise.

There are certainly many activists pushing for their local governments to enact similar bans to the one attempted by West Lafayette. To them, receiving counseling from a biblical perspective for someone who experiences same sex attraction or confusion over their gender identity equates to “conversion therapy” and must be banned. The left particularly wants to prohibit parents from accessing counseling on these topics for their children. It is children who often experience these identity questions most intensely as they grow. This makes them prime targets for the left who want to stave off any notion in a child’s mind that they should adhere to the religious principles with which their parents raised them.

Conclusion

According to the worldview of the left, the Christian principles which millions adhere to daily and teach to their children are nothing more than “pseudoscience” that must be banned. If liberal activists get their way, parents seeking help for their children or children who themselves seek advice on how to best live according to their religious principles in the difficult areas of sexuality and gender would be told no by the government. They would be told that for a child to go to a pastor or religious counselor for help in these matters is illegal. Instead, the left encourages minors to act in accordance with any sexual impulse they may feel and considers this to be the new norm. Indiana must not allow this dangerous reversal of the truth. No church or faith-based organization providing counseling should be threatened or shut down by their government. It is the job of government to protect religious freedom, and with the passage of SB 350, that is just what Indiana has the opportunity to do.

IFI supports SB 350.

  Back

OPPOSE HB 1568: Allowing over-the-counter access to contraceptives

Summary

HB 1568 would allow for pharmacists to prescribe and dispense contraceptives over-the-counter. This would allow patients to receive contraceptives on demand without a prescription from their doctor. This includes both hormonal contraceptive patches and oral hormonal contraceptives which are self-administered. The bill’s definition of contraceptives relies upon the FDA’s standards. Any pharmacist can be approved to prescribe contraceptives under this legislation as long as they complete a training program designed by the Indiana Board of Pharmacy. Pharmacists are also barred from requiring patients to schedule an appointment with them to obtain the contraceptives. 

Analysis

The decision to take hormonal contraceptives is much too serious to allow such medications to be prescribed over-the-counter by pharmacists. Women need to consult with their personal doctors on this matter, having the opportunity to be fully informed by someone who has a relationship with them. Doctors know the health history of their patients and the details of birth control, including its risks, making them a necessary party in this decision. Hormonal birth control is known to potentially cause several harmful side effects, such as increased risk of blood clots, heart attack, and stroke. It can also lead to elevated risk of breast cancer, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, and ovarian cancer. It is vital that women have the approval of their doctors on this matter, to make sure that taking hormonal contraceptives is safe for them.

Furthermore, allowing contraceptives to be dispensed over-the-counter makes it much more likely that drugs which actually cause abortions will be more easily accessible to the public. In the past, the FDA has classified some abortion-inducing drugs as merely contraceptives, claiming they simply prevent pregnancy when evidence shows that they can also end a human life after it has begun. In the aftermath of Roe v. Wade’s overruling, abortion activists are increasingly looking to pharmacies and supposed methods of easier contraception access to make abortifacients more accessible, including in states with pro-life laws like Indiana. 

Conclusion

Our state must not allow hormonal contraceptives to be treated like any simple over-the-counter medication, as this leaves the door open to a myriad of health risks for women and a decrease in overall standards which may allow abortion-inducing drugs to become more available. The doctor-patient relationship through which contraception has always been made available in Indiana is a vital bulwark against the increasing amount of abortion-inducing drugs sold on dark corners of the internet and in states will policies favoring abortion. As shown by the pro-life legislation passed by the Indiana General Assembly in 2022, we are a pro-life state. We must not allow the progress that has been made for the unborn to be rolled back by clever tricks of the pro-abortion movement, but must continue to fight for the right of every unborn child to be protected in the womb.

IFI opposes HB 1568.

  Back

SUPPORT HB 1608: Prevents teaching on sexual and gender identity in grades K-3

Summary

House Bill 1608 prevents schools from teaching children in kindergarten through third grade any content related to sexual orientation or gender identity. This prohibition includes instruction that would be offered by any employee or staff member of a school or any third party service that a school may seek to use. The topics included under this legislation which must not be taught are listed as gender fluidity, gender roles, gender stereotypes, gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation.

Analysis

Schools exist to teach children foundational skills like math, science, reading, and history, not to fill their minds with radical notions of sexuality and gender ideology. Particularly in grades K-3rd, which are the very beginning of a child’s education, the instruction provided by teachers needs to focus on what matters most. It must stay away from political activism or any ideas regarding sex and gender that can so easily confuse children. Unfortunately, this is far from the case in many schools today, where left-wing ideologies have turned classrooms of all grade levels into breeding grounds for radical beliefs. 

HB 1608 addresses this problem directly, declaring that instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity should simply not occur for students in kindergarten through 3rd grade. Especially at this young age, parents bear the responsibility of guiding their children in personal matters and passing on their convictions. Teachers should not interfere in this territory, but should focus on the core subjects that elementary school children need to learn. While IFI would support a prohibition on sexuality and gender instruction all the way up to 12th grade, this legislation is an important step in that direction.

Conclusion

HB 1608 will make clear that Hoosier schools are places where children are safe from political indoctrination. The radical ideologies that harm students and push out traditional subjects will be no more. Children will be able to focus on the foundational curriculum they receive in kindergarten through third grade, properly setting them up for future learning. Parents will not have to worry that their child will come home with dangerous and inappropriate ideas about sex and gender told to them by a teacher. HB 1608 provides much needed clarification on what the classroom is for and will set the stage for further legislation to come that removes harmful topics from education.

IFI supports HB 1608.

IFI also supports SB 413 which would prohibit instruction on sexuality and gender identity up to 12th grade, addresses other matters related to how schools handle these topics, and addresses how schools approach parental rights.

  Back

SUPPORT HB 1569: Restrictions on transgender surgeries and medications for inmates

Summary

House Bill 1569 specifies several ways in which the Indiana Department of Correction (DOC), which runs state prisons, may not aid inmates in receiving medical procedures for the purpose of appearing as the opposite sex. The legislation says that the department may not authorize the payment of any money towards, or use any state resources or federal funds administered by the state, to allow an inmate to receive transgender procedures or medication. This includes hormone therapy and sexual reassignment surgeries that are intended to make one appear or function as the opposite sex.

Analysis

The Indiana Department of Correction is responsible for providing a secure and wisely managed environment for those convicted of crimes. They have a duty not just to the inmates they house, but also to the general public who will eventually live alongside many of the inmates once they are released. Hoosiers should be able to trust that the DOC is actually treating inmates in a way that is most constructive to their overall lifestyle and behavior, not giving into any demands or misconceptions inmates may have that would make circumstances worse. Surrendering to the false promises of transgender ideology by facilitating sex changes for inmates would be a clear instance of the DOC failing to live up to their duty. 

We live in an era where activists are increasingly pushing the notion that trangender surgeries and medications are just a normal form of health care. Medical professionals and government bureaucrats are increasingly adopting this view as well, meaning that even agencies in a conservative state like Indiana are not immune. Indiana residents should be able to expect more out of our state government, trusting that it will not cave to radical ideologies. For the DOC this means affirming truth, not lies, when it comes to inmates who request transgender medication or surgeries. To give in to these demands not only prevents the inmate from getting true help, but also could lead to dangerous situations where a biological male ends up living amongst women in a female prison or visa-versa.

Conclusion

The Department of Correction has a responsibility to Hoosiers to care for offenders in a way that keeps the public safe before and after an inmate’s release. The DOC has no room to play around with false science in a way that only serves to give credence to a radical ideology and worsen the lives of inmates themselves. Furthermore, the DOC has a duty to make prison environments safe, and allowing a male to live, sleep, and shower alongside females in order to not run afoul of modern thinking on gender would be a gross violation of its mission. HB 1569 helps affirm the true purpose of Indiana’s Department of Correction, shielding it and all Hoosiers from another harmful aspect of transgender ideology.

IFI supports HB 1569.

  Back